Skip to content
 

Disbar the Florida Bar

Monday 11/8 & Tuesday 11/9 hear Meryl Lanson’s story of trouble with the Florida Bar.

Jack Thompson discusses his trials and tribulations with the Florida Bar on Thursday 11/11 and Friday 11/12.

Click here -> to listen live 2:00pm to 3:00pm weekdays

“I can’t say it any clearer” Les Winston’s summary of more than 30 radio shows…

Disbar The Florida Bar is a 501 (c)(4). 501(c)(4) organizations are corporations operated exclusively for the promotion of social welfare, the net earnings of which are devoted exclusively to charitable, educational, or recreational purposes. Unlike 501(c)(3) organizations, 501(c) (4) organizations may lobby for legislation; they may also participate in political campaigns and elections, as long as campaigning is not the organization’s primary purpose.

Contributions to 501(c)(4) organizations are not deductible as charitable contributions. 501(c)(4) organizations are not required to disclose their donors publicly. This aspect of the law has led to extensive use of the 501(c)(4) provisions for organizations that are actively involved in lobbying.

Archived shows are HERE

7 Comments

  1. Raimundo Couret says:

    Thank you Vette and Mr Winston. I am conscious of all problems I will have to face now and this is why I will not surrender under duress, panic, stress. coercion, intimidation, and other types of mental torture that include but are not limited to EXTORTION by confabulated attorneys with serious CONFLICTS OF INTEREST.

    Since DOA I have endured three delicate surgeries. One of the URINARY TRACT, tje second of the LUMBAR SPINE at Jackson Memorial Hospital in Miami, a year ago and the more recent las August for the cervical vertebrae. Complications almost killed me, but I survived both procedures.

    Yet, my lawyer has written to me indicating that the lesion “could be due to a more recent accident”, but refuses to show proofs of her baseless written implied accusation. When, where, and how did the alleged accident take place. Where is the Police Report and to what emergency room was I taken for such severe lesions that she said I was faking. This is a sign of Incapacity if not of DISHONESTY.

    The answer form the JUDICIARY DIVISION OF TFB regarding my direct accusation against Judge Sasser for flagrant violations of the RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE (as explained in another message to DISBAR THE FLORIDAD BAR was not only vague, contradictory and clumsy (limited to only one and a half misleading lines. the COUNSEL intended to make me believe that he was giving me a CASE NUMBER by playing a childish Ton&Jerry game. Actually what the caption shows is the CODE for other issues having nothing to do with my GRIEVANCE.

    Two predatory Insurers are both behind the racket in spite of the fact that both have serious CONFLICTS OF INTEREST. Herein I do not name then because MR. WINSTON might have problems with insurers that he may or may not represent from his Insurance Agency.

    TO MAKE IT WORSE, the attorneys from both insurers as well as mine for a long time have refused to provide me with certified copies of a DEPOSITION that I took last year, although Defense Attorney named PARADELA sent me (by way of my lawyer) a supposed copy or transcript, but both stubbornly refuse to provide me with the DVD in my own voice and that of INTERROGATOR PARADELA so that I can at least call their attention on ERRATA. They both know that I am entitled to the LEGAL MATERIALS denied to me.

    Since Ms. Lawyer took my case on CONTINGENCY, she wants to take vital decisions in my stake. Moreover, she has insisted in different tricks (strictly prohibited by the bar) in order to get rid of the crystal-clear CASE that RESPONDENTS cannot win in Court, either before a honest judge or before a JURY.

    MR. LES WINSTON:
    For all of the above circumstances and many others violations of the WRITTEN LAW, the issues at stake may turn up your stomach as well as those of your listeners. This is whyI hereby ask of you to grant me the honor of being interviewed in Show. Thank you in advance.

    RAIMUNDO COURET, C.L.U and ALL LINES INSURANCE SPECIALIST.

    MARGNAL NOTES:
    In one of the cases I have successfully represented myself for over five years. The other one is in the hands of above mentioned lawyer to whom I still give the probably undeserved benefit of the doubt.
    My new address is 12255 SW 187 Terrace, Miami, Florida. My telephone number is the same you have.

  2. I hope that at least this time the Bar’s Regulations might be respected and that the JUDICIARY DIVISIONB will not throw the tower for powerful Circuit Court Judge Meenu T. Sasser. The accusations targeting her include verifiable racketeering, traffic of influences, violation of the RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, and other acts of Prevarication. This includes the arbitrary denial [by her own actions] the opportunity of a day in court for a fair trial and any access to key legal materials to which I am entitled by Rules of Civil Process.

    THE CONSWPIRCY GOAL IS to OBVIOUS: To refuse to reopen File in spite of overwhelming new discoveries and nasty negligence of Court’s CLERK. Said NEGLIGENCE or TORT has not been mine, but the Court,so that my complaints against at-fault predatory insurance carriers and their LAWYERS expire by themselves due to Statutes of Limitations. This is not only illegal, but also nasty because it violates my most intrinsic civil rights as a law abiding citizen. ANY QUESTIONS?

  3. CORRUPTION IN THE WEST PALM BEACH CIRCUIT COURT IS TYPIFIED BY TRAFFIC OF INFLUENCES AND RACKETEERING. GRIEVANCE PRESENTED TO THE JUDICIARY DIVISION OF TFB AND REQUEST FOR INVESTIGATION MAY BE PUBLIC RECOD ALREADY.

    JUDGE MEENU T. SASSER, of the West Palm Beach Circuit Court has exhausted her maneuvers to protect at-fault attorneys representing GAINSCO INSURANCE GROUP, and indirectly PROGRESSIVE SELECT INSURANCE CO. Both in open violation of Florida Rule 69B-220.201. The WPB Law Firm of KIRWAN SPELLACY and DANNER also represents WPB SECURITY AGENCY ASSOCIATES PROTECTIVE SERVICES for their complicity in criminal acts targeting this permanently and totally disabled senior citizen.

    Bar Counsel FRANCISCO JAVIER GREER appears willing to investigate Probable Cause. All material proofs in Court’s Files are at the fingertip of the JUDICIARY DIVISION’S PERSONNEL as well.

    SCOTT DANNER elected to default rather than lying in Court, This may be the reason for which just two days after I applied for the due Certificate of Default, the Case was “mysteriously” closed, but no one signed the order to close it. On the Document denying Certificate of Default, in the blank space to state Reasons it reads “OTHER”. What dos “Other” mean?

    Consequently, at least three times I have complied with the requirements of the bar to resuscitate a closed file. They are 1) NEWLY-FOUND DISCOVERIES substantiated by medical records and new surgery procedures, and 2) ADMINISTRATIVE ERRORS, but I have always crashed against the solid concrete wall of the CLERK, in spite of the fact that during one of the hearings the JUDGE ordered me to go straight to the CLERK to obtain the document that she needed to serve Justice. The result was the same: File remained closed.

    In the last hearing, however, DANNER sent his associates in his representation. They alleged that this PLAINTIFF had failed to send them the Citation. When I insisted that I could show proofs to the contrary, JUDGE SASSER dictated that “the file must remain closed”.

    If I failed to mail the Citation to Danner’s Lawyers, how is it that they showed up? Further, if they did not lie in Court, the liar is the UNITED STATE POSTAL SERVICE because I took the precaution of certifying letters. As if Certified Correspondence were not overwhelming enough, the USPS Ticket number is clearly printed on the top of each one of my pieces of correspondence. Moreover, the POSTAL SERVICE sent me the duly signed Return Receipts. Is Mr. Danner’s team credible?

    JUDGE SASSER perfectly knows that her prevarication violates quite a few parts of the RULES OF CIVIL PROCESS and denies me the right to a fair trial. Evidently, the goal of the Conspiracy consists of keeping File inactive until it expires by itself, so violating some of my most intrinsic civil rights as a law abiding citizen and pro-se litigant.

    Concurrently, JUDGE’s actions are intended to block my right of access to key legal materials such as Deposition Transcript (tainted), Recording in my own voice and that of interrogator, and a certified copy of stenographic version. How can I make sure that there is not any malicious errata and tainting of evidences? COURT REPORTING AGENCY refuses to serve said materials under the excuse that they “lost the CD”. Who has it?

    Bar’s Counsel sent me a confusing confirmation letter, but I have requested explanation of ambiguous wording. I would rather die on my feet that live on my knees. Are my citizen’s rights not protected by the CONSTITUTION, or are the licenses of attorneys and judiciary positions letters of marque(pronounced mar-kee). Spanish: Patente de Corso.

    WILL CONTINUE. DOES ANY READER HAVE A QUESTION?

  4. PREDATORY ATTORNEYS AND PHYSICIANS CONSPIRING WITH PREDATORY INSURANCE CARRIERS.
    I will not give the name of my attorney because I’d rather give her the benefit of the doubt, at least at this specific point in time. Yet, I’ll expose a common practice using my Case as an example.

    In order to prevent a farfetched accusation of UPL (Unlicensed Practice of Law), I hereby emphasize that this comment is intended to be my PERSONAL TESTIMONY regarding one or more of the black sheep of TFB. Said specimens practice “law” as if their licenses were actual LETRES OF MARQUI (French) or PATENTES DE CORSO (Spanish).

    My own attorney appears to have declared war on me when she discovered that I was not an easy prey of corrupt insurance carriers and unscrupulous or incompetent lawyers. In a private face-to-face interview in her Boca Raton Office, not long ago, Ms. Attorney attempted to coerce me by openly accusing me of building up my Case. Let’s go to the details:

    This victimized insurance consumer, a totally disabled senior citizen, was scheduled to go through the first of two delicate spine surgeries. However, instead I requested a personal face-to-face interview with Mr. Surgeon. My goal was to clarify a lot of doubts that I still had. To my immense surprise, the Surgeon delegated his Office Manager to deal with me.

    My doubts arouse from the fact that the orthopedic doctor practiced from an AMBULATORY SURGERY FACILITY in Palm Beach County and my legitimate questions were:
    1: Will the spine surgery be performed here or at a hospital.
    2: Where will post-surgery rehabilitation take place, who will be my therapist (if any).
    3: How long will I have to stay as an in-patient?
    4: According to a Medicare Publication entitled WHO PAYS FIRST, “Medicare takes over AS THE PRIMARY INSURER once PIP Benefits become exhausted and this is my Case. Therefore, the Doctor will bill Medicare for his fees. Right or right?

    THE DECEIT: I was almost in shock when I learned that the Surgeon was not a MC provider and therefore I would be personally liable for the Surgeon’s fees, $35,000.00 for each one of the two procedures ($70,000.00 plus other costs such as use of the OR, etc. etc. etc.).

    THE SNARE: I was mislead to believe that Mr. Surgeon was an MEDICARE and MEDICAID Provider, but according to Dr. X’s Office Manager, the fees would be paid out of my compensation proceeds as per a LETTER OF PROTECTION from Ms. Attorney. (?????)

    As I said: “No way!!!” and “There will be no Surgery by Dr. X”, the Office Manager became scandalous intending to make me believe that I was under the obligation to allow surgery. Did she think that she was dealing with an ignorant?

    As she ran to another room to call up my lawyer I said: “This is my personal decision and neither you, nor the surgeon, nor my attorney have any jurisdiction to compel me to decide according to your financial convenience.

    Sickening, right?

    WILL CONTINUE…

    MARGINAL NOTE: HAPPILY, THE SO-BADLY NEEDED SPINE SURGERY TOOK PLACE ON THE 18TH OF DICEMBRER AT JACKSON MEMORIA HOSPITAL AND WAS SUCCESSFULLY PERFORMED BY ONE OF THE BEST NEUROSURGEONS IN THE NATION. DR. MICHAEL WANG, NEUROSURGERY PROFESSOR AT THE SCHOOL OF MEDICINE OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI.

  5. Raimundo Couret says:

    CONTINUEATION OF PERVIOUS COMMENT ENTITLED “LET GET OFF THE CLOUDS…”

    WHY DO JUSTICE SYSTEM OFFICERS VICTIMIZE THIS DISABLED SENIOR CITIZEN? Because each one of the named prevaricators perfectly know (or should know) that if they comply with their “sacred” duty to investigate substantiated criminal activities, their only alternative will be to take their collegues to Criminal Court, unless the attorney General prefers to call KFR’s attention to make the due correction of unnoticed errors.

    POTENTIALLY AGGRAVATING FACTOR: A letter from an employee of DIVISION OF CITIZEN COMLAINTS state that it is not the duty of the Attorney General’s Office to investigate criminal allegations against “individuals”

    CONTRADICTIONS: All record documents clearly show that:
    1: My Complaint was not against any individual as stated by employee in the Bureau of Complaints by Citizens. On the contrary, my inquiry targeted KFR and her personnel for Circumbention of the Law.
    2: Said error and the request for correction are both under the jurisdiction of the Attorney General.
    3: KFR failed to comply with her own duties and it looks as if she intendes to cover tha backs of her peers.

    IT IS NOT MY FAULT IF ALL TARGETED INDIVIDUALS MAY BE MOTIVATED BY THEIR OWN POLITICAL INTERESTS. THEREFORE, I WONDER WHETHER WE ARE BEING RULLED BY A MASKED CHAVEZ-STYLE “LEGAL” SYSTEM.

    I personally take full responsability for each one of my allegations and will therefore welcome any comment intended to convince me that I am dead wrong. Further, unless the comment above was being monitored by authorities, it is extremely hard for me to undestand why it was automatically posted with the warning “your comment is awaiting moderation?” Did anyone ivade my privacy without a judicial order? Was the warning coercive? If so, why?

  6. Raimundo Couret says:

    LET US GET OFF THE CLOUDS. DOES THE JUDICIARY BRANCH OF THE U.S. GIVERNMENT REALLY PROTECT THE CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS OF U.S. CITIZENS, OR IS IT A SCREEN GRANTING LETTERS OF MARQUE TO OUR “UNTOUCHABLE” SACRED COWS?

    CORSAIRS AND PIRATES: In earlier centuries, European Monarchies granted ship owners certain licenses empowering tham to take away the propoerty of others as long as they shared the loot with the King or Queen. Licensees were given the title of CORSAIRS. Independent sea bandits were called PIRATES. Neither pirates nor corsairs recognized any limits to actions that in modern law are known as FELONIES.

    MODERN CORSAIRS: The Web-page DISBAR THE FLORIDA BAR shows so many complaints against
    “untouchable” sacred cows that it makes it obvious that the U.S. Justice System has is losing its credibility by failing to reflect the image of honor that it should project to all citizens and residents of this Great Nation.

    IDENTIFYING A FEW “UNTOUCHABLES”: It is not my fault of yours if the US ATTORNEY GENERAL nominated by the PRESIDENT has been declared in contempt by Congress. Neither is it if Wilfredo Ferrer, REGIONAL ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR SOUTH FLORIDA, personally appointed by the President as well, appears to be engaged in illegal activities such as covering up Circumvention of the Law by Katherine Fernandez Rundle, STATE ATTORNEY FOR MIAMI-DADE COUNTY.

    Scott E. Danner and Felipe Enrique Diez, “brilliant” members of the Florida Bar (TFB) have engaged in criminal activities in open violation of some of my most intrinsic constitutional rights. By their disgraceful conduct they have knowingly, willfully and viciously violated a FEDEERAL LAW known as THE WANTON ACT.

    SUBSTANCE OF VIOLATIONS: 1) Use of sophisms masking criminal activities targeting this abused senior citizen totally disabled for the rest of his life. 2) Circumvention of the Law by MIAMI-DADE STATE ATTORNEY Katerine Fernandez Rundle and her assistants Ulises Martinez, Juan Somoano, and Juan Solano. 3) Twisting, concealment, and misrepresentation of relevant facts by “mysteriously” disappearing a well documented Complaint File from the Records of the State Attorney’s Office.

  7. Vette says:

    Just cause you got the monkey off your back doesn’t mean the circus has left town.

Leave a Reply